Models of Amplitude as a function of Offset require compressional velocities,
shear velocities, and bulk densities for a model. Conventional methods
of producing models for AVO models involve estimating these properties
for homogenous layers of varying thicknesses. Seismotech's
method involves taking well logs, sonic and density logs, in conjunction
with lithologic and other petrophysical information based on other logs
(resistivity logs, gamma ray and spontaneous potential logs, porosity logs)
to estimate shear wave velocities varying almost continuously using petrophysical
models (as Biot-Gassmann theory) to estimate fluid effects on model velocities
and density. GeoGraphix's PRIZM and QLA2 are used for all log analysis
tasks as estimating water saturation, average porosity and effective porosity.
Fluid substitution modeling and estimation of shear wave velocities are
done in Rock Solid Images' PetroTools.
An example of calculated fluid effects is shown
below where gas has been substituted for water in a brine sand (Sw is changed
from 100% to 30% in the sand). The change in compressional sonic
transit time is indicated in track 4 in red, and change in shear
sonic transit time is indicated in blue. In track 2 the bulk density
for the gas case is indicated by the dashed brown curve, while the solid
brown curve represents the bulk density in the brine case (before fluid
substitution). Porosity logs are shown in the fifth track for denisty
porosity, neutron porosity, sonic porosity, effective wet porosity, and
average porosity.

After compressional and shear velocities and bulk density is estimated for brine and gas models, GeoGraphix's GMAplus AVO modeling program is used to calculate synthetic gathers (as shown below for a gas case which is unrelated to the log example shown above) which can be compared with observed seismic data processed to maintain and enhance seismic amplitude information in order to test these models.
Hampson-Russell AVO program is also often used to calculate gradient and zero-offset (P-wave) stacks and angle or offset stacks for comparison with AVO models. Hampson-Russell AVO is also capable of modeling fluid replacement effects although blocking of logs is necessary.